Energy Positivity — Remark 4 #
Sharpens the indicator energy criterion (Lemma 7) to rule out the conull case
by proving E_λ(1) > 0. The archimedean energy integral of the constant function
is positive because translation by any t ∈ (0, 2L) moves the support boundary,
creating a region where 1_I and S_t(1_I) disagree.
Reference: lamportform.tex, Remark 4 (lines 698–723).
Inner integral positivity #
For 0 < t < 2L with L > 0, the L² norm of
zeroExtend 1 I - S_t(zeroExtend 1 I) is positive.
The functions disagree on Ioo (-L) (-L + t).
Archimedean energy positivity #
The archimedean energy integral of the constant function 1 is positive
when cutoffLambda > 1. Each point t ∈ (0, 2L) contributes a positive
integrand since archWeight(t) > 0 and the inner integral is positive.
Energy form positivity #
The energy form of the constant function 1 is positive:
E_λ(1) > 0. This is the key fact that rules out the conull case
in the indicator energy criterion.
Conull indicator has the same energy as 1 #
If B is conull in I, zero-extending 1_B and 1 over I are ae-equal.
The disagreement set is contained in I \ B, which has measure zero.
If B is conull in I, then E_λ(1_B) = E_λ(1).
The ae-equality of the zero-extended functions propagates through
the energy form via lintegral_congr_ae.
Main theorem #
Remark 4 (Energy positivity): If E_λ(1_B) = 0 for measurable B ⊆ I,
then volume B = 0.
Combines energyForm_indicator_null_or_conull (Lemma 7) with
energyForm_one_pos to rule out the conull case: if B were conull,
then E_λ(1_B) = E_λ(1) > 0, contradicting E_λ(1_B) = 0.
Reference: lamportform.tex, Remark 4 (lines 698–723).